I have to say, the best part of The Bluest Eye is seeing the community being taken on by a young
girl in Ohio during the early 1940’s. Cat Moses states the key components
present in the literature, and without Claudia giving backgrounds of everyone
in this book, it’d probably be serious, crude, and a lot less impacting.
Claudia takes everything into her own perspective. She
analyzes and questions every situation to give a feel for the time period, and
she depends on someone else to give her an answer. It most cases it’s effective
because it’s easy to understand the lifestyle from a little girl’s view. It’s
best shown through life lessons she’s learned. One of them had been: put out
vs. being outdoors. Claudia states, “Being put out means there was always a
place to go. Being outdoors meant there was nowhere to go.” She doesn’t know
anything about being put out. She lives in a decent home, and her mother takes
in people that had to deal with situations they couldn’t handle. It’s effective
in the book. It kind of makes you think of Pecola. She was put out, but she was
also an outcast in the community. They shoved her “outdoors” with their
assumptions and prejudices. Though her mother made sure she had a physical, yet
broken home to stay in. I mean, with Claudia’s simple approach you can kind of
grasp how this leads up to her tragic life throughout the rest of the book.
Unlike her serious sister, Claudia also questions love. She
wants to seek the nature of it in a few situations; after Pecola gets her
period, when Mr. Henry touches Frieda inappropriately, seeing the prostitutes,
etc. Since she’s ten, it leaves the reader to form their own perception of love
in terms of the context given in the prologue. She’s helping to foreshadowing
the events to come. The scene with Mr. Henry was especially memorable since he
was looked highly upon. It was almost like Cholly at some point when he met
Pauline; both were respectable, and somewhat nice, until they molested and permanently
scarred a little girl. They remain scarred; in relation to Moses, I feel like
no one in this book had a sense of empowerment. I looked at Frieda as a strong
girl, until the incident that turned her into an alcoholic. Same with the
prostitutes; Marie had a voice until the two girls told her their mother
thought she was ruined. Her empowerment no longer there. And of course Pecola
is the only acceptation. She had some sort of empowerment over her Blue Eyes,
but she’s still affected by Cholly inflicting his ugliness on her.
Overall, even with the contradictions Moses points out about
Claudia, you have to take in the fact that there’s somewhat a better
understanding of advantages and disadvantages young black girls, broken
families, and dysfunctional relationships at the time.
I agree completely. The book is enhanced by the fact that it is narrated from the point of view of a little girl. It's funny, a lot of books about horrible things are told from this perspective. Because children are less biased and have less prior knowledge about life, I think they make more accurate judgements about people. Overall quality blog and keep up the quality work.
ReplyDeleteDoug
I think you really did well explaining how because Claudia is a child and the narrator so there are pints were a few situations seem weird like when frieda was being touched because she is a child. I like how you stood up for Claudia strongly tho. I feel that she is reliable.
ReplyDelete